The electronics industry changes so rapidly that new technology inevitably becomes dated or obsolete soon after release. The latest smart phones soon take their place in attic storage along side boxy personal computers, old high-end CD players and tiny flip-phones. On average, consumers generate nearly twenty pounds of electronic garbage each year, and Dallas e-waste processing can help them recycle it responsibly.
Toxic materials are an important part of computer-based technologies. Prior to the introduction of flat-screen displays, massively heavy cathode-ray tubes included barium, a poisonous metal also used in automobile and lighting manufacturing. Circuit boards commonly contain cadmium, potentially harmful to kidneys and bones. Mercury, chromium, and even lead are other lethal metal components, often framed in plastics resistant to decay or flame.
The public is well-informed about the need for recycling, but that awareness has had little impact on the growing presence of e-waste. It is common for manufacturing companies to have no officially expressed policy regarding ultimate disposal, and even environmentally progressive bodies such as the European Union can account for less than one quarter of the electronic garbage generated. United States figures go even lower, and much of that is exported for metal extraction.
In an ideal world, electronics makers would take full responsibility for recycling their own products, and that is becoming a reality in some cases. In Texas, computer and TV makers are now required by law to offer free recycling services for consumers, and must publicize those opportunities. While many major corporations willingly choose to participate, others say recycling is the responsibility of buyers, not makers.
Even the most environmentally concerned consumers rarely know the exact destination of their discarded units. Collection events are popular, an increasing number of services offer free pickup, and charitable programs designed to re-purpose old devices are common. Countries that are known destinations for reprocessing often battle a growing domestic e-waste problem of their own, and typically exercise few controls worker exposure to toxins.
Once removed from local sites, there are few guarantees that this material will not become a part of a larger issue. Some poorer nations in Asia and Africa willingly accept shipments that provide economic opportunities for local people, even though there may be environmental penalties for doing so. In wealthier countries, creating a disposal program based on cost alone is not always a sustainable or wise choice.
In an effort to increase transparency and public trust, some disposal firms are seeking certification through independent agencies. Although some states currently fine companies for infractions, no uniform national laws governing e-waste processes currently exist on a national scale. While the proliferation of pickup and removal programs is helpful for consumers, few controls govern the final destination.
People living in Austin and other Texas municipalities increasingly turn to recycling companies who are willingly transparent regarding their own processes. Some companies have begun maintaining detailed tracking systems that follow materials from beginning to end, including the destination country. This not only helps control pollution, but also reduces health hazards for the people dependent on that work for survival.
Toxic materials are an important part of computer-based technologies. Prior to the introduction of flat-screen displays, massively heavy cathode-ray tubes included barium, a poisonous metal also used in automobile and lighting manufacturing. Circuit boards commonly contain cadmium, potentially harmful to kidneys and bones. Mercury, chromium, and even lead are other lethal metal components, often framed in plastics resistant to decay or flame.
The public is well-informed about the need for recycling, but that awareness has had little impact on the growing presence of e-waste. It is common for manufacturing companies to have no officially expressed policy regarding ultimate disposal, and even environmentally progressive bodies such as the European Union can account for less than one quarter of the electronic garbage generated. United States figures go even lower, and much of that is exported for metal extraction.
In an ideal world, electronics makers would take full responsibility for recycling their own products, and that is becoming a reality in some cases. In Texas, computer and TV makers are now required by law to offer free recycling services for consumers, and must publicize those opportunities. While many major corporations willingly choose to participate, others say recycling is the responsibility of buyers, not makers.
Even the most environmentally concerned consumers rarely know the exact destination of their discarded units. Collection events are popular, an increasing number of services offer free pickup, and charitable programs designed to re-purpose old devices are common. Countries that are known destinations for reprocessing often battle a growing domestic e-waste problem of their own, and typically exercise few controls worker exposure to toxins.
Once removed from local sites, there are few guarantees that this material will not become a part of a larger issue. Some poorer nations in Asia and Africa willingly accept shipments that provide economic opportunities for local people, even though there may be environmental penalties for doing so. In wealthier countries, creating a disposal program based on cost alone is not always a sustainable or wise choice.
In an effort to increase transparency and public trust, some disposal firms are seeking certification through independent agencies. Although some states currently fine companies for infractions, no uniform national laws governing e-waste processes currently exist on a national scale. While the proliferation of pickup and removal programs is helpful for consumers, few controls govern the final destination.
People living in Austin and other Texas municipalities increasingly turn to recycling companies who are willingly transparent regarding their own processes. Some companies have begun maintaining detailed tracking systems that follow materials from beginning to end, including the destination country. This not only helps control pollution, but also reduces health hazards for the people dependent on that work for survival.
About the Author:
You can visit www.ztechglobal.net for more helpful information about How Dallas E-Waste Processing Centers Are Combating A Growing Problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment